Key role for myeloid cells: Phase II results of anti‐GD2 antibody 3F8 plus granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor for chemoresistant osteomedullary neuroblastoma
Open Access
- 18 March 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 135 (9), 2199-2205
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28851
Abstract
Anti‐GD2 murine antibody 3F8 plus subcutaneously (sc) administered granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) was used against primary refractory neuroblastoma in metastatic osteomedullary sites. Large study size and long follow‐up allowed assessment of prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis not reported with other anti‐GD2 antibodies. In a phase II trial, 79 patients without prior progressive disease were treated for persistent osteomedullary neuroblastoma documented by histology and/or metaiodobenzyl‐guanidine (MIBG) scan. In the absence of human antimouse antibody, 3F8 + scGM‐CSF cycles were repeated up to 24 months. Minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow was measured by quantitative reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction pre‐enrollment and post‐cycle #2, before initiation of 13‐cis‐retinoic acid. Study endpoints were: (i) progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with the predecessor trial of 3F8 plus intravenously administered (iv) GM‐CSF (26 patients) and (ii) impact of MRD on PFS. Using all 105 patients from the two consecutive 3F8 + GM‐CSF trials, prognostic factors were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression model. Complete response rates to 3F8 + scGM‐CSF were 87% by histology and 38% by MIBG. Five‐year PFS was 24 ± 6%, which was significantly superior to 11 ± 7% with 3F8 + ivGM‐CSF (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, significantly better PFS was associated with R/R or H/R FCGR2A polymorphism, sc route of GM‐CSF and early MRD response. MYCN amplification was not prognostic. Complement consumption was similar with either route of GM‐CSF. Toxicities were manageable, allowing outpatient treatment. 3F8 + scGM‐CSF is highly active against chemoresistant osteomedullary neuroblastoma. MRD response may be an indicator of tumor sensitivity to anti‐GD2 immunotherapy. Correlative studies highlight the antineoplastic potency of myeloid effectors.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (CA106450, CA118845, CA72868)
- Hope Street Kids, Alexandria, VA
- Justin Zahn Fund, NY
- Katie's Find A Cure Fund, NY
- Robert Steel Foundation, NY
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unlicensed NK cells target neuroblastoma following anti-GD2 antibody treatmentJCI Insight, 2012
- Promising Therapeutic Targets in NeuroblastomaClinical Cancer Research, 2012
- Activation of Peripheral-Blood Granulocytes Is Strongly Correlated With Patient Outcome After Immunotherapy With Anti-GD2 Monoclonal Antibody and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2012
- Genotypes of NK Cell KIR Receptors, Their Ligands, and Fcγ Receptors in the Response of Neuroblastoma Patients to Hu14.18-IL2 ImmunotherapyCancer Research, 2010
- Antitumor Activity of Hu14.18-IL2 in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Neuroblastoma: A Children's Oncology Group (COG) Phase II StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Anti-GD2 Antibody with GM-CSF, Interleukin-2, and Isotretinoin for NeuroblastomaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Exploiting Gene Expression Profiling to Identify Novel Minimal Residual Disease Markers of NeuroblastomaClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Disialoganglioside Directed Immunotherapy of NeuroblastomaCancer Investigation, 2007
- Consolidation Treatment With Chimeric Anti-GD2-Antibody ch14.18 in Children Older Than 1 Year With Metastatic NeuroblastomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Intensive Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation, and 13-cis-Retinoic AcidThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1999