Sex Determination from Hand and Foot Bone Lengths
- 1 March 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Vol. 52 (2), 264-270
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00365.x
Abstract
Numerous studies have addressed sex estimation from the hands and feet with varying results. These studies have utilized multiple measurements to determine sex from the hands and feet, including measures of robusticity (e.g., base width and midshaft diameter). However, robusticity measurements are affected by activity, which can disguise underlying patterns of sexual dimorphism. The purpose of this study is to investigate the utility of length measurements of the hands and feet to estimate sex. The sample consists of white females (n=123) and males (n=136) from the Terry Collection. Discriminant function analysis was used to classify individuals by sex. The left hand outperformed both the right hand and foot producing correct classification rates exceeding 80%. Surprisingly, the phalanges were better sex discriminators than either the metacarpals or metatarsals. This study suggests that length measures are more appropriate than robusticity measures for sex estimation.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- New siding techniques for the manual phalanges: a blind testInternational Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2006
- Variation in femoral length is associated with polymorphisms in RUNX2 geneBone, 2006
- Articular area responses to mechanical loading: effects of exercise, age, and skeletal locationAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2001
- Postcranial robusticity in Homo. III: OntogenyAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1994
- Articular and diaphyseal remodeling of the proximal femur with changes in body mass in adultsAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1991
- The estimation of sex on the basis of the talus and calcaneusAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1976