Sensitivity to Change and Responsiveness of Four Balance Measures for Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Open Access
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in PTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal
- Vol. 92 (3), 388-397
- https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100398
Abstract
Impaired balance has a significant negative impact on mobility, functional independence, and fall risk in older adults. Although several, well-respected balance measures are currently in use, there is limited evidence regarding the most appropriate measure to assess change in community-dwelling older adults. The aim of this study was to compare floor and ceiling effects, sensitivity to change, and responsiveness across the following balance measures in community-dwelling elderly people with functional limitations: Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment total scale (POMA-T), POMA balance subscale (POMA-B), and Dynamic Gait Index (DGI). Retrospective data from a 16-week exercise trial were used. Secondary analyses were conducted on the total sample and by subgroups of baseline functional limitation or baseline balance scores. Participants were 111 community-dwelling older adults 65 years of age or older, with functional limitations. Sensitivity to change was assessed using effect size, standardized response mean, and paired t tests. Responsiveness was assessed using minimally important difference (MID) estimates. No floor effects were noted. Ceiling effects were observed on all measures, including in people with moderate to severe functional limitations. The POMA-T, POMA-B, and DGI showed significantly larger ceiling effects compared with the BBS. All measures had low sensitivity to change in total sample analyses. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly better sensitivity to change in people with lower compared with higher baseline balance scores. Although both the total sample and lower baseline balance subgroups showed statistically significant improvement from baseline to 16 weeks on all measures, only the lower balance subgroup showed change scores that consistently exceeded corresponding MID estimates. This study was limited to comparing 4 measures of balance, and anchor-based methods for assessing MID could not be reported. Important limitations, including ceiling effects and relatively low sensitivity to change and responsiveness, were noted across all balance measures, highlighting their limited utility across the full spectrum of the community-dwelling elderly population. New, more challenging measures are needed for better discrimination of balance ability in community-dwelling elderly people at higher functional levels.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important ImprovementPTJ: Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal, 2011
- Community-dwelling older adults with balance impairment show a moderate increase in fall risk, although further research is required to refine how balance measurement can be used in clinical practiceEvidence-Based Nursing, 2010
- Increased Velocity Exercise Specific to Task Training Versus the National Institute on Aging's Strength Training Program: Changes in Limb Power and MobilityThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2009
- The Dynamic Gait Index in healthy older adults: The role of stair climbing, fear of falling and genderGait & Posture, 2009
- Use of the Short Physical Performance Battery Score to Predict Loss of Ability to Walk 400 Meters: Analysis From the InCHIANTI StudyThe Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 2009
- Exercise for improving balance in older peoplePublished by Wiley ,2007
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- Longitudinal Construct ValidityMedical Care, 2000
- Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic EvaluationMedical Care, 1990
- Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrumentPhysiotherapy Canada, 1989