Achieving universal health coverage goals in Thailand: the vital role of strategic purchasing
Open Access
- 5 November 2014
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Policy and Planning
- Vol. 30 (9), 1152-1161
- https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czu120
Abstract
Strategic purchasing is one of the key policy instruments to achieve the universal health coverage (UHC) goals of improved and equitable access and financial risk protection. Given favourable outcomes of Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), this study synthesized strategic purchasing experiences in the National Health Security Office (NHSO) responsible for the UCS in contributing to achieving UHC goals. The UCS applied the purchaser–provider split concept where NHSO, as a purchaser, is in a good position to enforce accountability by public and private providers to the UCS beneficiaries, through active purchasing. A comprehensive benefit package resulted in high level of financial risk protection as reflected by low incidence of catastrophic health spending and impoverished households. The NHSO contracted the District Health System (DHS) network, to provide outpatient, health promotion and disease prevention services to the whole district population, based on an annual age-adjusted capitation payment. In most cases, the DHS was the only provider in a district without competitors. Geographical monopoly hampered the NHSO to introduce a competitive contractual agreement, but a durable, mutually dependent relationship based on trust was gradually evolved, while accreditation is an important channel for quality improvement. Strategic purchasing services from DHS achieved a pro-poor utilization due to geographical proximity, where travel time and costs were minimal. Inpatient services paid by Diagnostic Related Group within a global budget ceiling, which is estimated based on unit costs, admission rates and admission profiles, contained cost effectively. To prevent potential under-provisions of the services, some high cost interventions were unbundled from closed end payment and paid on an agreed fee schedule. Executing monopsonistic purchasing power by NHSO brought down price of services given assured quality. Cost saving resulted in more patients served within a finite annual budget.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Promoting universal financial protection: how the Thai universal coverage scheme was designed to ensure equityHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2013
- Universal Coverage on a Budget: Impacts on Health Care Utilization and Out-of-Pocket Expenditures in ThailandSSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
- Why has the Universal Coverage Scheme in Thailand achieved a pro-poor public subsidy for health care?BMC Public Health, 2012
- Scaling up cervical cancer screening in the midst of human papillomavirus vaccination advocacy in ThailandBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- Strengthening Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Thailand through the Establishment of the Health Intervention and Technology Assessment ProgramPharmacoEconomics, 2009
- Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunitiesThe Lancet, 2008
- Catastrophic and poverty impacts of health payments: results from national household surveys in ThailandPublished by WHO Press ,2007
- The Incidence of Public Spending on Healthcare: Comparative Evidence from AsiaThe World Bank Economic Review, 2007
- Economic Evaluation of Palliative Management versus Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis for End-Stage Renal Disease: Evidence for Coverage Decisions in ThailandValue in Health, 2007
- Budget Impact Analysis of Extending Access to Renal Replacement Therapy under Universal Coverage in Thailand.SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006