Reliability of Digital Versus Conventional Cephalometric Radiology: A Comparative Evaluation of Landmark Identification Error
- 30 June 2005
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Seminars in Orthodontics
- Vol. 11 (2), 98-110
- https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.002
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: I. hard tissueSeminars in Orthodontics, 2004
- At what resolution should I scan cephalometric radiographs?American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2004
- An introduction to digital radiography in dentistryJournal of Orthodontics, 2002
- Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: guidelines for cephalometric analysesClinical Orthodontics and Research, 2000
- Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiographyDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2000
- A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysisEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1981
- The reliability of head film measurements: 2. Conventional angular and linear measuresAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1971
- The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identificationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1971
- An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysisAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1966
- A Comparison Between the Frankfort Horizontal and the Sella Turcica -Nasion as Reference Planes in Cephalometric AnalysisActa Odontologica Scandinavica, 1957