Guidelines for Quality in Autobiographical Forms of Self-Study Research
- 1 April 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 30 (3), 13-21
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030003013
Abstract
The authors situate the origins of self-study in four developments within education: the growing prominence of naturalistic inquiry methods, the rise of the Reconceptualist movement in curriculum studies, the increased involvement of international scholars in teacher education research, and the re-emergence of action research and its variations. They focus on autobiography and correspondence (e-mail, letters, recorded conversations) not only because these are the dominant forms of self-study but because of the demands they present for producers and consumers. The work of C. Wright Mills (1959) is used to provide a framework for determining what makes a piece of self-study writing research. Mills argues that personal troubles cannot be solved as merely troubles, but must be understood in terms of public issues and history (p. 226). Insights are drawn from literary conventions. A set of guidelines are provided for consideration by self-study researchers in their quest for greater quality.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The New Scholarship in Teacher EducationEducational Researcher, 1999
- On narrativeTeaching and Teacher Education, 1997
- We're Just Like the Beginning Teachers We Study: Letters and Reflections on Our First Year as Beginning ProfessorsCurriculum Inquiry, 1994
- Narrative Discourse and Teacher KnowledgeAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1991
- Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth)International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 1985
- Anatomy of CriticismPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1957