Beyond Opinion Leaders
- 22 April 2012
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Communication Research
- Vol. 41 (3), 353-374
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212443824
Abstract
The number of Americans who report engaging in interpersonal persuasion during elections has drastically increased over the past decade. While past studies have demonstrated the impact of such proselytizing on vote choice, the author finds substantial evidence that it may also have larger democratic benefits, both for those attempting to persuade and for those whom they choose to target. Data from the 2008 National Annenberg Election Survey suggest that (a) attempting to persuade contributes to people’s ability to give reasons in support of both their own preferred candidate and the opposing candidate, and (b) persuasive conversation is a powerful channel for the spread of political information from the more engaged to the less engaged.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Grassroots Mobilization in the 2008 Presidential ElectionJournal of Political Marketing, 2009
- Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political ScienceAnnual Review of Political Science, 2008
- Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science, 2008
- Confusion or Enlightenment?Communication Research, 2008
- How Messages Affect Their Senders: A More General Model of Message Effects and Implications for DeliberationCommunication Theory, 2007
- Unanimity, Discord, and the Communication of Public OpinionAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2007
- Indirect MobilizationAmerican Politics Research, 2004
- Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in PracticeAmerican Political Science Review, 2002
- News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative DemocracyPolitical Communication, 1999
- On Legitimacy and Political DeliberationPolitical Theory, 1987