Abstract
This article critically explores public space as a site and object of policy, and examines the way in which the spatial agendas of the New Urban Left and New Labour have been articulated to normative paradigms of community. I argue that both Labour approaches are limited in their understanding and approach towards space. In particular, their concep tion of public space as an already existing site for policy detracts atten tion from the processes of creating public space. In focusing on this process, I reject a public space framework based on formally universal access to explore the capacity of spaces to create communities as public— in other words as collectivities of strangers sharing equal regard. The final section explores the role of spatial heterogeneity, use-bans and cul tural symbols in developing public space.