Incident rates of colonic neoplasia in older patients: When should we stop screening?
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 21 (6), 1021-1025
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04218.x
Abstract
Current guidelines endorse colon cancer screening every 5-10 years in patients over 50 years of age. However, there is no consensus regarding what age is appropriate to stop screening. The aim of this study was to characterize neoplasia occurrence/recurrence in a large cohort of patients > or =70 years of age undergoing colonoscopy. The Mayo Rochester endoscopic database was reviewed to determine the incidence of colonic neoplasia in patients > or =70 years undergoing two colonoscopies at least 12 months apart between January 1996 and December 2000. Patients were classified based on (i) age: 70-74, 75-79, > or =80 years; and (ii) polyp detection on initial examination, that is, subsequent examination for screening or surveillance. Overall, 1353 patients underwent two colonoscopies at least 12 months apart (median interval 140 weeks) with removal of polyp on initial examination in 726 (53.7%) patients (surveillance cohort). On subsequent endoscopy, polyps > or =10 mm were detected in 54 (4.0%) and cancer in 13 (1.0%) patients. All age groups were well matched with respect to detection of neoplasia on index examination (P = 0.9) and polyp size on initial colonoscopy among the surveillance group (P = 0.9). Using a Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for neoplasia (polyps > or =10 mm) were: 2.0 (1.50-2.73, P < 0.0001) (surveillance vs screening), 1.33 (0.96-1.79, P = 0.08) (> or =80 vs 70-74), and 1.05 (0.78-1.38, P = 0.75) (75-79 vs 70-74). Adjusted hazard ratios for development of cancer were: 1.87 (1.03-3.97, P = 0.04) (surveillance vs screening), 1.73 (0.84-3.56, P = 0.13) (> or =80 vs 70-74), and 1.38 (0.71-2.77, P = 0.34) (75-79 vs 70-74). Prior history of neoplasia remains a strong risk factor for colorectal neoplasia development in elderly patients and should be considered when deciding the need for continuing screening/surveillance. Incident neoplasia rates in a previously screened elderly population rise slowly with advancing age although cancer rates rise more sharply. Therefore, screening still retains a role in elderly patients; however, clinical judgment is still required to individualize screening practice. As the risk of competing comorbid illnesses continues to increase over time, the threshold to perform colon screening should increase accordingly.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-upGastroenterology, 1998
- Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1997
- Importance of Adenomas 5 mm or Less in Diameter That Are Detected by SigmoidoscopyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: A prospective studyGastroenterology, 1995
- Randomized Comparison of Surveillance Intervals after Colonoscopic Removal of Newly Diagnosed Adenomatous PolypsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Relationship of Polyps to Cancer of the Large IntestineJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1992
- Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polypsGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991
- Review of recurrent polyps and cancer in 500 patients with initial colonoscopy for polypsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1988
- Colorectal Polyps and the Risk of Subsequent CarcinomaMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1986
- A Prospective Study of Diagnostic Methods in Adenoma Follow-upEndoscopy, 1982