Patient‐defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a qualitative analysis
Open Access
- 14 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Health Expectations
- Vol. 19 (5), 1036-1043
- https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12393
Abstract
Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) at high risk for aortic valve replacement are a unique population with multiple treatment options, including medical therapy, surgical aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Traditionally, in elderly populations, goals of treatment may favour quality of life over survival. Professional guidelines recommend that clinicians engage patients in shared decision making, a process that may lead to decisions more aligned with patient-defined goals of care. Goals of care for high-risk patients with AS are not well defined in the literature, and patient-reported barriers to shared decision making highlight the need for explicit encouragement from clinicians for patient involvement. The purpose of this study was to elicit and report patient-defined goals from elderly patients facing treatment decisions for severe AS. This analysis was conducted at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, an academic medical institution. In a retrospective manner, we qualitatively analysed goal statements reported by high-risk, elderly patients with severe AS evaluated for TAVR between June 2012 and August 2014. Forty-six patients provided treatment goals during consideration of TAVR and defined preferred outcomes as maintaining independence, staying alive, reducing symptoms or, most commonly, increasing their ability to do a specific activity or hobby. In the high-risk patient population considering TAVR, patient-reported goals may be obtained with a simple question delivered during the clinical encounter. Encouraging patients to define their goals may lead to a greater degree of shared decision making, as advocated in current professional guidelines.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using a ‘talk’ model of shared decision making to propose an observation-based measure: Observer OPTION5 ItemPatient Education and Counseling, 2013
- Authoritarian Physicians And Patients’ Fear Of Being Labeled ‘Difficult’ Among Key Obstacles To Shared Decision MakingHealth Affairs, 2012
- Patient Values and Preferences in Decision Making for Antithrombotic Therapy: A Systematic Review: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice GuidelinesSocial psychiatry. Sozialpsychiatrie. Psychiatrie sociale, 2012
- Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsPublished by Wiley ,2011
- Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Health outcome prioritization to elicit preferences of older persons with multiple health conditionsPatient Education and Counseling, 2011
- Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo SurgeryThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Treatment Goals in Addiction Healthcare: the Perspectives of Patients and CliniciansInternational Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2010
- Understanding the Treatment Preferences of Seriously Ill PatientsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Fates worse than death: The role of valued life activities in health-state evaluations.Health Psychology, 1996