Comparison of Magnetic Navigation System and Conventional Method in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Is Magnetic Navigation System Is More Effective and Safer Than Conventional Method?
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by The Korean Society of Cardiology in Korean Circulation Journal
- Vol. 41 (5), 248-252
- https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2011.41.5.248
Abstract
Choi MS, et al. Korean Circ J. 2011 May;41(5):248-252. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2011.41.5.248Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in a High‐Volume Center in 1,000 Procedures: Still Cause for Concern?Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2009
- Impact of Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation on Ablation Fluoroscopy and Procedure TimePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2008
- Initial Clinical Experience with a Remote Magnetic Catheter Navigation System for Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus‐Dependent Right Atrial FlutterPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2008
- Remote Magnetic NavigationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2007
- Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratoryEuropean Heart Journal, 2006
- Robotic Magnetic Navigation for Atrial Fibrillation AblationJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006
- Remote magnetic navigation for mapping and ablating right ventricular outflow tract tachycardiaHeart Rhythm, 2006
- Initial experience with remote catheter ablation using a novel magnetic navigation system. Magnetic remote catheter ablationACC Current Journal Review, 2004
- Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation SystemCirculation, 2004