A Simple Effective Method for Generation of a Permanent Record of the Critical View of Safety during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Intraoperative “Doublet” Photography
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 218 (2), 170-178
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.003
Abstract
The Critical View of Safety (CVS) is an established method for identifying the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Its goal is to prevent misidentification of the bile ducts and avoid biliary injury. However, a visual record of CVS is not usually made. Intraoperative photography has the potential to record CVS and increase the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The objective of this study was to develop a simple and effective technique for recording CVS during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Techniques for photographing and rating photographs of CVS were developed. Surgeons were trained in methods of photographing both anterior and posterior views of CVS during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Independent observers scored these views individually and together. The term doublet view was used when both anterior and posterior views of CVS were used for rating. Three criteria for CVS were used for scoring photographs. A total score of ≥ 5 of 6 points was considered satisfactory, and a total score 40 predicted a higher likelihood of unsatisfactory individual CVS photos (p = 0.02); however, there was no correlation between patient or pathologic factors and the scores of doublet views. With training and adherence to straightforward photographic techniques, intraoperative doublet photography can record CVS accurately. This method is performed easily, and could be used for recording of CVS in the medical record.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Operative notes do not reflect reality in laparoscopic cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventionsSurgical Endoscopy, 2011
- Rationale and Use of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic CholecystectomyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2010
- Evaluation of Operative Notes Concerning Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Are Standards Being Met?World Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Evaluation of Protocol Uniformity Concerning Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in The NetherlandsWorld Journal of Surgery, 2008
- Der „Sicherheits-Blick” als Beitrag zur Risikoreduktion bei der laparoskopischen CholezystektomieZentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, 2006
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy after the learning curve: what should we expect?Surgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Quality control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operation notes, video or photo print?HPB, 2001
- The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the danger of the false infundibulumJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000