Intensive statin therapy compared with moderate dosing for prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of >40 000 patients
Open Access
- 8 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 32 (11), 1409-1415
- https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr035
Abstract
Statin therapy is associated with important benefits for patients at risk of, and with, established cardiovascular disease. There is widespread interest in whether intensive dosing of statins yields larger treatment effects. We aimed to determine if intensive dosing is clinically important using a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases from inception to December 2010. We included any RCT evaluating a larger dose with a clinically common dose. Two reviewers independently extracted data, in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and a trial sequential analysis. We identified 10 RCTs enrolling a total of 41 778 participants. Trials followed patients for a mean of 2.5 years. We did not find statistically significant effects on all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–1.03, P = 0.14, I2 = 38%] or cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.78–1.01, P = 0.07, I2 = 34%). When we pooled the composite endpoint of coronary heart disease (CHD) death plus non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), we found a significant protective effect of intensive statin dosing (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.84–0.96, P ≤ 0.0001, I2 = 0%). We also found a significant effect on non-fatal MIs (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.76–0.89, P ≤ 0.0001, I2 = 0%) and a significant reduction in the composite of fatal and non-fatal strokes (excluding transient ischaemic attacks) reported in 10 RCTs (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77–0.96, P = 0.006, I2 = 0%). A subgroup analysis of three trials examining acute coronary syndrome patients found significant effects on all-cause (RR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.61–0.91, P = 0.005, I2 = 0%) and CVD mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59–0.94, P = 0.013, I2 = 0%) with intensive dosing. Applying an analysis of optimal information size on the primary analysis, we found that the evidence for CHD death plus non-fatal MIs is conclusive. The evidence for CVD deaths alone is not yet conclusive. Available evidence suggests that intensive statin therapy reduces the risk of non-fatal events and may have a role in reducing mortality.This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170 000 participants in 26 randomised trialsThe Lancet, 2010
- Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Mortality and Events With Statin Treatments: A Network Meta-Analysis Involving More Than 65,000 PatientsJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2008
- Over-the-Counter Sales of Statins and Other Drugs for Asymptomatic ConditionsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Statin Therapy in Stroke Prevention: A Meta-analysis Involving 121,000 PatientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effect of Very High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Regression of Coronary AtherosclerosisJAMA, 2006
- Can Low-Density Lipoprotein Be Too Low? The Safety and Efficacy of Achieving Very Low Low-Density Lipoprotein With Intensive Statin Therapy: A PROVE IT-TIMI 22 SubstudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statinsThe Lancet, 2005
- Intensive statin therapy in acute coronary syndromes: clinical benefits and vascular biologyCurrent Opinion in Lipidology, 2004
- Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary SyndromesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Statin Therapy in Acute Coronary SyndromesArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 2002