Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy
- 14 April 2010
- reference entry
- research article
- Published by Wiley
- No. 4,p. CD007058
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd007058.pub2
Abstract
Background Diagnostic ultrasound is a sophisticated electronic technology, which utilises pulses of high frequency sound to produce an image. Diagnostic ultrasound examination may be employed in a variety of specific circumstances during pregnancy such as after clinical complications, or where there are concerns about fetal growth. Because adverse outcomes may also occur in pregnancies without clear risk factors, assumptions have been made that routine ultrasound in all pregnancies will prove beneficial by enabling earlier detection and improved management of pregnancy complications. Routine screening may be planned for early pregnancy, late gestation, or both. The focus of this review is routine early pregnancy ultrasound. Objectives To assess whether routine early pregnancy ultrasound for fetal assessment (i.e. its use as a screening technique) influences the diagnosis of fetal malformations, multiple pregnancies, the rate of clinical interventions, and the incidence of adverse fetal outcome when compared with the selective use of early pregnancy ultrasound (for specific indications). Search methods We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (September 2009). Selection criteria Published, unpublished, and ongoing randomised controlled trials that compared outcomes in women who experienced routine versus selective early pregnancy ultrasound (i.e. less than 24 weeks' gestation). We have included quasi‐randomised trials. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently extracted data for each included study. We used the Review Manager software to enter and analyse data. Main results Routine/revealed ultrasound versus selective ultrasound/concealed: 11 trials including 37505 women. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy reduces the failure to detect multiple pregnancy by 24 weeks' gestation (risk ratio (RR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 0.17). Routine scan is associated with a reduction in inductions of labour for 'post term' pregnancy (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83). Routine scans do not seem to be associated with reductions in adverse outcomes for babies or in health service use by mothers and babies. Long‐term follow up of children exposed to scan in utero does not indicate that scans have a detrimental effect on children's physical or cognitive development. Authors' conclusions Early ultrasound improves the early detection of multiple pregnancies and improved gestational dating may result in fewer inductions for post maturity. Caution needs to be exercised in interpreting the results of aspects of this review in view of the fact that there is considerable variability in both the timing and the number of scans women received.Keywords
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prenatal ultrasound exposure and children's school performance at age 15-16: follow-up of a randomized controlled trialUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2009
- Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length to predict preterm birth in asymptomatic women at increased risk: a systematic reviewUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2008
- Evidence-based care of women with a multiple pregnancyBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2005
- First trimester ultrasound screening is effective in reducing postterm labor induction rates: A randomized controlled trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Feasibility of the second‐trimester fetal ultrasound examination in an unselected population at 18, 20 or 22 weeks of pregnancy: a randomized trialUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome–a prospective randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Clinical safety statement 1994European Journal of Ultrasound, 1995
- Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development.BMJ, 1993
- Routine ultrasonography in utero and school performance at age 8-9 yearsThe Lancet, 1992
- Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational ageBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991