Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Current Opinion in Cardiology
- Vol. 21 (4), 400-404
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hco.0000231412.15049.fb
Abstract
In 2001, the Adult Treatment Panel III of the National Cholesterol Education Program issued recommendations, which were updated in 2004 to reflect knowledge from five major clinical trials completed after 2001. This review discusses the results of key clinical trials released in 2005 and their potential impact on the guidelines. Three major clinical trials, one subgroup analysis, and one meta-analysis were published in 2005 that can potentially affect the existing guidelines. The Treating to New Targets and the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering trials demonstrated the incremental benefit of more aggressive low-density cholesterol lowering in stable coronary heart disease. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis of statin trials supported the importance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction, irrespective of initial lipid profile, in reducing cardiovascular events. A subgroup analysis of the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial - Lipid-Lowering Arm demonstrated statin benefits in diabetes, whereas the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study failed to show overall treatment benefits with a fibrate in diabetes. Lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remains central in reducing cardiovascular risk; however, the recent trials support a target of less than 2.0 mmol/l (<80 mg/dl), rather than the less than 1.8 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) suggested by the 2004 update, for all high-risk patients and not, as recommended previously, just for those with additional factors. For individuals with diabetes, recent data support the use of statin therapy, even in those at less than high risk. First-line therapy should remain statins and not fibrates.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- High-Dose Atorvastatin vs Usual-Dose Simvastatin for Secondary Prevention After Myocardial InfarctionThe IDEAL Study: A Randomized Controlled TrialJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2005
- Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statinsThe Lancet, 2005
- Reduction in Cardiovascular Events With Atorvastatin in 2,532 Patients With Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2005
- Intensive Lipid Lowering with Atorvastatin in Patients with Stable Coronary DiseaseThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Implications of Recent Clinical Trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III GuidelinesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2004
- Intensive versus Moderate Lipid Lowering with Statins after Acute Coronary SyndromesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Prevention of coronary and stroke events with atorvastatin in hypertensive patients who have average or lower-than-average cholesterol concentrations, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2003
- Major Outcomes in Moderately Hypercholesterolemic, Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Pravastatin vs Usual Care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2002
- Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialThe Lancet, 2002