Oncologists’ Attitudes Toward and Practices in Giving Bad News: An Exploratory Study
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (8), 2189-2196
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.08.004
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the attitudes and practices of oncologists in disclosure of unfavorable medical information to cancer patients. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to a group of physicians who attended the 1999 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The questionnaire assessed demographic and practice-related information and the frequency of patient encounters in which unfavorable cancer-related information was disclosed. Participants were also asked about difficulties they had when approaching stressful discussions and communication strategies used in giving unfavorable information. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 167 oncologists. Sixty-four percent were medical oncologists. Thirty-eight percent practiced in North America, 26% practiced in Europe, 13% practiced in South America, and 13% practiced in Asia. Participants gave bad news to patients an average of 35 times per month. Discussing no further curative treatment and hospice was reported as most difficult. In disclosing the cancer diagnosis and prognosis, physicians from Western countries were less likely to withhold unfavorable information from the patient at the family’s request, avoid the discussion entirely, use euphemisms, and give treatments known not to be effective so as not to destroy hope than physicians from other countries. There was significant variability in opinions regarding the best time to discuss resuscitation, with 18% of respondents believing that it should be done close to the end of life. CONCLUSION: There was significant variability in how physicians approach information disclosure to cancer patients. Factors such as geographical region and cultural and family variables may be important influences in this process.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication skills training in oncologyCancer, 1999
- Patients' Preferences for Participation in Clinical Decision Making: A Review of Published SurveysBehavioral Medicine, 1998
- Truth‐telling Practice in Cancer Care in JapanAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997
- Communication with the Cancer Patient.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997
- Is It Wise to Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth to a Cancer Patient?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997
- The development of a training model to improve health professionals' skills, self-efficacy and outcome expectancies when communicating with cancer patientsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1997
- Questioning diagnosis disclosure in terminal cancer patients: a prospective study evaluating patients' responsesPalliative Medicine, 1994
- Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patientsSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1988
- ‘Telling bad news’: physicians and the disclosure of undesirable informationSociology of Health & Illness, 1988
- Breaking bad news: why is it still so difficult?BMJ, 1984