Cross-Modal Stimulus Conflict: The Behavioral Effects of Stimulus Input Timing in a Visual-Auditory Stroop Task
Open Access
- 29 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (4), e62802
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062802
Abstract
Cross-modal processing depends strongly on the compatibility between different sensory inputs, the relative timing of their arrival to brain processing components, and on how attention is allocated. In this behavioral study, we employed a cross-modal audio-visual Stroop task in which we manipulated the within-trial stimulus-onset-asynchronies (SOAs) of the stimulus-component inputs, the grouping of the SOAs (blocked vs. random), the attended modality (auditory or visual), and the congruency of the Stroop color-word stimuli (congruent, incongruent, neutral) to assess how these factors interact within a multisensory context. One main result was that visual distractors produced larger incongruency effects on auditory targets than vice versa. Moreover, as revealed by both overall shorter response times (RTs) and relative shifts in the psychometric incongruency-effect functions, visual-information processing was faster and produced stronger and longer-lasting incongruency effects than did auditory. When attending to either modality, stimulus incongruency from the other modality interacted with SOA, yielding larger effects when the irrelevant distractor occurred prior to the attended target, but no interaction with SOA grouping. Finally, relative to neutral-stimuli, and across the wide range of the SOAs employed, congruency led to substantially more behavioral facilitation than did incongruency to interference, in contrast to findings that within-modality stimulus-compatibility effects tend to be more evenly split between facilitation and interference. In sum, the present findings reveal several key characteristics of how we process the stimulus compatibility of cross-modal sensory inputs, reflecting stimulus processing patterns that are critical for successfully navigating our complex multisensory world.This publication has 61 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual Mechanisms for the Cross-Sensory Spread of Attention: How Much Do Learned Associations Matter?Cerebral Cortex, 2009
- Priming and Backward Influences in the Human Brain: Processing Interactions during the Stroop Interference EffectCerebral Cortex, 2009
- Temporal window of integration in auditory-visual speech perceptionNeuropsychologia, 2007
- Crossmodal binding: Evaluating the “unity assumption” using audiovisual speech stimuliPerception & Psychophysics, 2007
- Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesisPhilosophical Transactions B, 2007
- Color-Word Matching Stroop Task: Separating Interference and Response ConflictNeuroImage, 2001
- Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998
- Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1998
- Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1996
- The time course of picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1984