2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases
- Vol. 74 (10), 1789-1798
- https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208237
Abstract
Objective Existing criteria for the classification of gout have suboptimal sensitivity and/or specificity, and were developed at a time when advanced imaging was not available. The current effort was undertaken to develop new classification criteria for gout. Methods An international group of investigators, supported by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism, conducted a systematic review of the literature on advanced imaging of gout, a diagnostic study in which the presence of monosodium urate monohydrate (MSU) crystals in synovial fluid or tophus was the gold standard, a ranking exercise of paper patient cases, and a multi-criterion decision analysis exercise. These data formed the basis for developing the classification criteria, which were tested in an independent data set. Results The entry criterion for the new classification criteria requires the occurrence of at least one episode of peripheral joint or bursal swelling, pain, or tenderness. The presence of MSU crystals in a symptomatic joint/bursa (ie, synovial fluid) or in a tophus is a sufficient criterion for classification of the subject as having gout, and does not require further scoring. The domains of the new classification criteria include clinical (pattern of joint/bursa involvement, characteristics and time course of symptomatic episodes), laboratory (serum urate, MSU-negative synovial fluid aspirate), and imaging (double-contour sign on ultrasound or urate on dual-energy CT, radiographic gout-related erosion). The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria are high (92% and 89%, respectively). Conclusions The new classification criteria, developed using a data-driven and decision-analytic approach, have excellent performance characteristics and incorporate current state-of-the-art evidence regarding gout.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Delphi Exercise to Identify Characteristic Features of Gout — Opinions from Patients and Physicians, the First Stage in Developing New Classification CriteriaThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2013
- Tips and tricks to recognize microcrystalline arthritisRheumatology, 2012
- The 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: Phase 2 methodological reportArthritis & Rheumatism, 2010
- Diagnosis of Chronic Gout: Evaluating the American College of Rheumatology Proposal, European League Against Rheumatism Recommendations, and Clinical JudgmentThe Journal of Rheumatology, 2010
- Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for GoutJCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 2009
- A new method for scoring additive multi‐attribute value models using pairwise rankings of alternativesJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2008
- Gout in the UK and Germany: prevalence, comorbidities and management in general practice 2000-2005Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2007
- Gout epidemiology: results from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1990-1999Annals Of The Rheumatic Diseases, 2005
- Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary goutArthritis & Rheumatism, 1977