Observations on the removal of brood inoculated with Tropilaelaps mercedesae (Acari: Laelapidae) and the mite’s reproductive success in Apis mellifera colonies
- 24 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Experimental and Applied Acarology
- Vol. 62 (1), 47-55
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-013-9728-0
Abstract
This study assessed the response of Apis mellifera to brood deliberately infested with Tropilaelaps mercedesae. The reproductive success of T. mercedesae in mite-inoculated and naturally infested brood was also compared. The presence of T. mercedesae inside brood cells significantly affected brood removal. Thai A. mellifera removed 52.6 ± 8.2 % of the brood inoculated with T. mercedesae as compared to 17.2 ± 1.8 and 5.7 ± 1.1 % removal rates for the groups of brood with their cell cappings opened and closed without mite inoculation and the control brood (undisturbed, no mite inoculation), respectively. Brood removal peaked during the second and third days post inoculation when test brood was at the prepupal stage. Overall, non-reproduction (NR) of foundress T. mercedesae was high. However, when NR was measured based on the criteria used for Varroa, the naturally infested pupae (NIP) supported the highest NR (92.8 %). Newly sealed larvae inoculated with Tropilaelaps collected from newly sealed larvae (NSL) had 78.2 % NR and those inoculated with Tropilaelaps collected from tan-bodied pupae (TBP) had 76.8 % NR. Since Tropilaelaps is known to have a short development period and nearly all progeny reach adulthood by the time of host emergence, we also used two Tropilaelaps-specific criteria to determine NR. Foundresses that did not produce progeny and those that produced only one progeny were considered NR. Using these two criteria, NR decreased tremendously but showed similar trends with means of 65, 40 and 33 % for NIP, NSL and TBP, respectively. High NR in the NIP group may indicate increased hygienic behavior in Thai A. mellifera colonies. The removal of infested prepupae or tan-bodied pupae will likely decrease the reproductive potential of Tropilaelaps. Our study suggests that brood removal may be one of the resistance mechanisms towards T. mercedesae by naturally adapted Thai A. mellifera.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standard methods for varroa researchJournal of Apicultural Research, 2013
- Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2012
- Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) with the Trait of Varroa Sensitive Hygiene Remove Brood with All Reproductive Stages of Varroa Mites (Mesostigmata: Varroidae)Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2010
- Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combsExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2008
- Bees with Varroa Sensitive Hygiene preferentially remove mite infested pupae aged ≤ five days post cappingJournal of Apicultural Research, 2007
- DEFECATION BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF INSECTSAnnual Review of Entomology, 2006
- Parasitic Mites of Honey Bees: Life History, Implications, and ImpactAnnual Review of Entomology, 2000
- Honey Bees (Hyntenoptera: Apidae) in the United States That Express Resistance to Varroa jacobsoni (Mesostigmata: Varroidae)Journal of Economic Entomology, 1997
- Guest EditorialBee World, 1995
- THE RESISTANCE MECHANISM OF THE ASIAN HONEY-BEE, APIS-CERANA FABR, TO AN ECTOPARASITIC MITE, VARROA-JACOBSONI OUDEMANSJournal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1986