Meta-analysis in applied ecology
- 23 September 2009
- journal article
- Published by The Royal Society in Biology Letters
- Vol. 6 (1), 78-81
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0546
Abstract
This overview examines research synthesis in applied ecology and conservation. Vote counting and pooling unweighted averages are widespread despite the superiority of syntheses based on weighted combination of effects. Such analyses allow exploration of methodological uncertainty in addition to consistency of effects across species, space and time, but exploring heterogeneity remains controversial. Meta-analyses are required to generalize in ecology, and to inform evidence-based decision-making, but the more sophisticated statistical techniques and registers of research used in other disciplines must be employed in ecology to fully realize their benefits.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impacts of grazing on lowland heathland in north-west EuropeBiological Conservation, 2009
- Control of Pteridium aquilinum: Meta-analysis of a Multi-site Study in the UKAnnals of Botany, 2008
- Recent developments in meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Poor evidence-base for assessment of windfarm impacts on birdsEnvironmental Conservation, 2007
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communitiesNature, 2003
- Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioningNature, 2002
- Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public HealthConservation Biology, 2001
- Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public HealthConservation Biology, 2001
- Meta‐Analysis: A Valuable Tool in Conservation ResearchConservation Biology, 1994