Qualitative research and evidence based medicine
- 18 April 1998
- Vol. 316 (7139), 1230-1232
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230
Abstract
Qualitative research may seem unscientific and anecdotal to many medical scientists. However, as the critics of evidence based medicine are quick to point out, medicine itself is more than the application of scientific rules.1 Clinical experience, based on personal observation, reflection, and judgment, is also needed to translate scientific results into treatment of individual patients.2 Personal experience is often characterised as being anecdotal, ungeneralisable, and a poor basis for making scientific decisions. However, it is often a more powerful persuader than scientific publication in changing clinical practice,3-5 as illustrated by the occasional series “A patient who changed my practice” in the BMJ. 6 In an attempt to widen the scope of evidence based medicine, recent workshops have included units on other subjects, including economic analysis and qualitative research.7 However, to do so is to move beyond the discipline of clinical epidemiology that underpins evidence based medicine. Qualitative research, in particular, addresses research questions that are different from those considered by clinical epidemiology. Qualitative research can investigate practitioners' and patients' attitudes, beliefs, and preferences, and the whole question of how evidence is turned into practice. The value of qualitative methods lies in their ability to pursue systematically the kinds of research questions that are not easily answerable by experimental methods. We use the example of asthma treatment to illustrate how qualitative methods can broaden the scope of evidence based medicine. Although there is consensus over evidence based practice in the treatment of asthma,8 questions remain about general practitioners' use of clinical guidelines and patients' use of prescribed medication.9 #### Summary points Qualitative methods can help bridge the gap between scientific evidence and clinical practice …Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualitative research in health care: II. A structured review and evaluation of studiesJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1996
- Scientific knowledge and social consensusControlled Clinical Trials, 1994
- Predicting patient attitudes to asthma medication.Thorax, 1993
- Guidelines for the management of asthma: a summary. British Thoracic Society and others.BMJ, 1993
- Who's Afraid of the Randomized Controlled Trial?Women & Health, 1990
- The State of the Art Versus the State of the Science: The Diffusion of New Medical Technologies into PracticeInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1988
- Meetings Between Experts: An Approach to Sharing Ideas in Medical ConsultationsContemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews, 1987
- Sources of Information About New Drugs and Attitudes Towards Drug Prescribing: An International Study of Differences Between Primary Care PhysiciansFamily Practice, 1987
- Chronic illness as biographical disruptionSociology of Health & Illness, 1982
- Doctor-Patient Negotiation and Other Social Science Strategies in Patient CarePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,1981