Should Patient-Rated Performance Status Affect Treatment Decisions in Advanced Lung Cancer?
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Thoracic Oncology
- Vol. 3 (10), 1133-1136
- https://doi.org/10.1097/jto.0b013e318186a272
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome of Patients With a Performance Status of 2 in the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Performance status score: do patients and their oncologists agree?British Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Use of the scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancerEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2002
- Comorbidity and KPS are independent prognostic factors in stage I non-small-cell lung cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
- Nutritional status of patients with advanced cancer: the value of using the subjective global assessment of nutritional status as a screening toolPalliative Medicine, 2002
- Prognostic value of performance status assessed by patients themselves, nurses and oncologists in advanced non-small cell lung cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Predictive factors of response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and the relation of response to survival in patients with metastatic urothelial cancerCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2000
- The Swedish version of the patient-generated subjectiveglobal assessment of nutritional status: gastrointestinal vs urological cancersClinical Nutrition, 1999
- How well do Medical oncologists' perceptions reflect their patients' reported physical and psychosocial problems?Cancer, 1998
- Survival determinants in extensive-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: the Southwest Oncology Group experience.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991