Clinimetric properties of the electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) for aged-care residents with moderate to severe dementia
Open Access
- 1 June 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Journal of Pain Research
- Vol. ume 11, 1037-1044
- https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s158793
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate pain assessment is critical to detect pain and facilitate effective pain management in dementia patients. The electronic Pain Assessment Tool (ePAT) is a point-of-care solution that uses automated facial analysis in conjunction with other clinical indicators to evaluate the presence and intensity of pain in patients with dementia. This study aimed to examine clinimetric properties (clinical utility and predictive validity) of the ePAT in this population group. Methods: Data were extracted from a prospective validation (observational) study of the ePAT in dementia patients who were ≥65 years of age, living in a facility for ≥3 months, and had Psychogeriatric Assessment Scales – cognitive scores ≥10. The study was conducted in two residential aged-care facilities in Perth, Western Australia, where residents were sampled using purposive convenience strategy. Predictive validity was measured using accuracy statistics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value). Positive and negative clinical utility index (CUI) scores were calculated using Mitchell’s formula. Calculations were based on comparison with the Abbey Pain Scale, which was used as a criterion reference. Results: A total of 400 paired pain assessments for 34 residents (mean age 85.5±6.3 years, range 68.0–93.2 years) with moderate–severe dementia (Psychogeriatric Assessment Scales – cognitive score 11–21) were included in the analysis. Of those, 303 episodes were classified as pain by the ePAT based on a cutoff score of 7. Unadjusted prevalence findings were sensitivity 96.1% (95% CI 93.9%–98.3%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 85.7%–97.1%), accuracy 95.0% (95% CI 92.9%–97.1%), positive predictive value 97.4% (95% CI 95.6%–99.2%), negative predictive value 87.6% (95% CI 81.1%–94.2%), CUI+ 0.936 (95% CI 0.911–0.960), CUI– 0.801 (95% CI 0.748–0.854). Conclusion: The clinimetric properties demonstrated were excellent, thus supporting the clinical usefulness of the ePAT when identifying pain in patients with moderate–severe dementia.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of a Pain Assessment Procedure in Long-Term Care Residents With Pain and DementiaJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2017
- Reliability of the Danish Abbey Pain Scale in severely demented and non-communicative older patientsInternational Journal of Palliative Nursing, 2016
- The relative meaning of absolute numbers: the case of pain intensity scores as decision support systems for pain management of patients with dementiaBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2015
- Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy: The Clinical Utility of Diagnostic TestsClinical Chemistry, 2012
- Pain Assessment in the Patient Unable to Self-Report: Position Statement with Clinical Practice RecommendationsPain Management Nursing, 2011
- Sensitivity × PPV is a recognized test called the clinical utility index (CUI+)European Journal of Epidemiology, 2011
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 2010
- The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementiaInternational Journal of Palliative Nursing, 2004
- Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic testsPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2000
- The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Radiology, 1982