Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation
Open Access
- 2 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
- Vol. 35 (1), 169-190
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x16646771
Abstract
This article uses the case of animal welfare to contribute to academic debates about audit and better regulation reforms designed to reduce administrative burdens and increase regulatory effectiveness. Combining desk-based policy document analysis, on-farm field visits, and 31 interviews with livestock farmers and animal health and welfare inspectors in England, it explores farmers' record-keeping practices and the contrasting role regulatory records are understood to play in assurance and good animal husbandry by farmers, regulatory inspectors, and veterinary experts. Farmers experience record-keeping as something they must do to satisfy external regulatory demands rather than anything that good farmers might themselves use in caring for their livestock. As a result they regard paperwork as burdensome and often fail to comply with record-keeping requirements. By contrast, inspectors and animal welfare experts frame record-keeping and analysis as central to good animal husbandry and to a properly anticipatory approach to managing animal health and welfare. Those veterinary-medical presumptions about farm practice inform both the design of specific animal welfare record-keeping requirements and their self-effacing conceit as being about peering over the farmer's shoulder to audit already existing records. Our findings highlight the dual tendency for the practice of regulatory record-keeping to become decoupled from both the formal requirements and from the quality of care that paperwork is meant to assure. Our analysis extends the critical literature on audit and regulation by drawing on the materialist tradition of science and technology studies to elucidate how this decoupling is shaped by the physical form and materiality of records themselves.This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futuresJournal of Rural Studies, 2013
- Reconstructing the good farmer identity: shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water qualityAgriculture and Human Values, 2012
- From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary WorldAcademy of Management Annals, 2012
- Enrolling Non-State Actors to Improve Compliance with Minimum Employment StandardsThe Economic and Labour Relations Review, 2011
- A historical synopsis of farm animal disease and public policy in twentieth century BritainPhilosophical Transactions B, 2011
- The Causes and Consequences of Private Food GovernanceBusiness and Politics, 2010
- Standards, techno-economic networks, and playing fields: Performing the global market economyReview of International Political Economy, 2010
- Responsibility and agency within alternative food networks: assembling the “citizen consumer”Agriculture and Human Values, 2008
- Regulating Food Risks: Rebuilding Confidence in Europe's Food?Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2004
- Regulating Public Bodies: The Case of Direct Service Organisations in British Local GovernmentEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2002