The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Top Cited Papers
- 23 August 2011
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Educational Psychology Review
- Vol. 23 (4), 553-576
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to Meta‐AnalysisPublished by Wiley ,2009
- Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehensionBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006
- Should the Simple View of Reading Include a Fluency Component?Reading and Writing, 2006
- Language Deficits in Poor Comprehenders: A Case for the Simple View of ReadingJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2006
- Subgrouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-Related AbilitiesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 2003
- Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match designReading and Writing, 2000
- Not All Reading Disabilities Are AlikeJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1999
- Predicting reading level in grades 1 to 6 from listening level and decoding level: Testing theory relevant to the simple view of readingReading and Writing, 1998
- Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 2- and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995
- Can Reading Disabilities Be Diagnosed Without Using Intelligence Tests?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1991