Using a Cost-Benefit Analysis to Estimate Outcomes of a Clinical Treatment Guideline: Testing the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines for the Treatment of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 63 (6), 1271-1278
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0b013e3181493080
Abstract
A decade after promulgation of treatment guidelines by the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF), few studies exist that examine the application of these guidelines for severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. These studies have reported both cost savings and reduced mortality. We projected the results of previous studies of BTF guideline adoption to estimate the impact of widespread adoption across the United States. We used surveillance systems and national surveys to estimate the number of severely injured TBI patients and compared the lifetime costs of BTF adoption to the current state of treatment. After examining the health outcomes and costs, we estimated that a substantial savings in annual medical costs ($262 million), annual rehabilitation costs ($43 million) and lifetime societal costs ($3.84 billion) would be achieved if treatment guidelines were used more routinely. Implementation costs were estimated to be $61 million. The net savings were primarily because of better health outcomes and a decreased burden on lifetime social support systems. We also estimate that mortality would be reduced by 3,607 lives if the guidelines were followed. Widespread adoption of the BTF guidelines for the treatment of severe TBI would result in substantial savings in costs and lives. The majority of cost savings are societal costs. Further validation work to identify the most effective aspects of the BTF guidelines is warranted.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United StatesPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2006
- Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and DeathsPublished by American Psychological Association (APA) ,2006
- Outcomes and Costs of Acute Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2002
- Management of severe head injury: Institutional variations in care and effect on outcome*Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Guidelines for the Management of Severe Head Injury: Are Emergency Physicians Following Them?Academic Emergency Medicine, 2002
- Predictors of Compliance with the Evidence-Based Guidelines for Traumatic Brain Injury Care: A Survey of United States Trauma CentersThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2002
- Development and Implementation of a Clinical Pathway for Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2001
- The Impact on Outcomes in a Community Hospital Setting of Using the AANS Traumatic Brain Injury GuidelinesJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2001
- Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 1999
- Survey of critical care management of comatose, head-injured patients in the United StatesCritical Care Medicine, 1995