Surgeon case volume, not institution case volume, is the primary determinant of in-hospital mortality after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
- 31 March 2011
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 53 (3), 591-599.e2
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.063
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Public Reporting on Access to Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: The California Outcomes Reporting ProgramThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Public reporting and pay-for-performance programs in perioperative medicine: Are they meeting their goalsCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Regionalization of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Evidence of a shift to high-volume centers in the endovascular eraJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2008
- Endovascular technology, hospital volume, and mortality with abdominal aortic aneurysm surgeryJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2008
- The Relationship Between Volume and Outcome Following Elective Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German HospitalsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2007
- The Unintended Consequences of Publicly Reporting Quality InformationJAMA, 2005
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- Hospital Volume, Length of Stay, and Readmission Rates in High-Risk SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiativeSurgery, 2001