Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes
- 15 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Water Research
- Vol. 45 (2), 473-482
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.006
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2006AA06Z307)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing PAC contribution to the NOM fouling control in PAC/UF systemsWater Research, 2010
- Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditionsWater Research, 2007
- Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performanceWater Research, 2007
- Transition in fouling mechanism in microfiltration of a surface waterWater Research, 2007
- Occurrence of a New Generation of Disinfection ByproductsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 2006
- Effect of Membrane Charge on Flow and Protein Transport during UltrafiltrationBiotechnology Progress, 2006
- Development of a novel electrophoresis-UV grafting technique to modify PES UF membranes used for NOM removalJournal of Membrane Science, 2006
- A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing: Experiments and modelingJournal of Membrane Science, 2005
- Competitive Interactions among Components of Humic Acids in Granular Activated Carbon Adsorption Systems: Effects of Solution ChemistryEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1996
- Evaluation of ultrafiltration for determining molecular weight of fulvic acidEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1984