A cost-effective analysis of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction
- 15 October 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 76 (11), 830-833
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80238-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Costs, effects and C/E‐ratios alongside a clinical trialHealth Economics, 1994
- Limitation of infarct size and preservation of left ventricular function after primary coronary angioplasty compared with intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1994
- Immediate coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction: Left ventricular ejection fraction, hospital mortality and reinfarctionJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1994
- Immediate Angioplasty Compared with the Administration of a Thrombolytic Agent Followed by Conservative Treatment for Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Comparison of Immediate Coronary Angioplasty with Intravenous Streptokinase in Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- A Comparison of Immediate Angioplasty with Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Immediate vs Delayed Catheterization and Angioplasty Following Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 1988
- THROMBOLYSIS WITH TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: NO ADDITIONAL BENEFIT FROM IMMEDIATE PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY ANGIOPLASTYThe Lancet, 1988