Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Vol. 99 (6), 722-730
- https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13841
Abstract
Introduction Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free fetal DNA has increasingly been adopted as a screening tool for fetal aneuploidies. Several studies have discussed benefits and limitations of NIPT compared with both ultrasound and invasive procedures, but in spite of some shortcomings NIPT has become extensively used within the last 5 years. This study aims to describe the current use of NIPT in Europe, Australia and the USA. Material and methods We conducted a survey to describe the current use of NIPT. Colleagues filled in a simple email-based questionnaire on NIPT in their own country, providing information on (a) access to NIPT, (b) NIPT's chromosomal coverage, (c) financial coverage of NIPT for the patient and (d) the proportion of women using NIPT in pregnancy. Some data are best clinical estimates, due to a lack of national data. Results In Europe, 14 countries have adopted NIPT into a national policy/program. Two countries (Belgium and the Netherlands) offer NIPT for all pregnant women, whereas most other European countries have implemented NIPT as an offer for higher risk women after first trimester screening. In Australia, either combined first trimester screening (cFTS) or NIPT is used as a primary prenatal screening test. In the USA, there are no national consensus policies on the use of NIPT; however, NIPT is widely implemented. In most European countries offering NIPT, the proportion of women using NIPT is well below 25%. In the Netherlands, Austria, Italy, Spain and most Australian and American States, 25%-50% of women have NIPT performed and in Belgium testing is above 75%. In most countries, NIPT reports on trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and often also on sex chromosome aneuploidies. Only in Belgium, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Greece, Cyprus and Italy is NIPT offered predominantly as a genome-wide test (including some microdeletions or a whole genome coverage). Conclusions Noninvasive prenatal testing has been widely adopted throughout Europe, Australia and the USA, but only a few countries/states have a national policy on the use of NIPT. The variation in NIPT utilization is considerable.Keywords
Funding Information
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF16OC0018772, NNFSA170030576)
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy in a national healthcare system: global challenges and national solutionsBMC Health Services Research, 2017
- Analysis of cell‐free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta‐analysisUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017
- Analysis of cell‐free fetal DNA in maternal blood for detection of trisomy 21, 18 and 13 in a general pregnant population and in a high risk population – a systematic review and meta‐analysisActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2016
- Practice Bulletin No. 163Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016
- Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first‐trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147 987 singleton pregnanciesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2015
- Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPTPrenatal Diagnosis, 2015
- Uptake of noninvasive prenatal testing at a large academic referral centerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2014
- Potential diagnostic consequences of applying non‐invasive prenatal testing: population‐based study from a country with existing first‐trimester screeningUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
- Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal DiagnosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Update on Procedure-Related Risks for Prenatal Diagnosis TechniquesFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2009