Why Older Adults and Their Children Disagree About In-Home Surveillance Technology, Sensors, and Tracking
- 18 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Gerontologist
- Vol. 60 (5), 926-934
- https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnz068
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Despite the surveilling nature of technologies that allow caregivers to remotely monitor location, movements, or activities, the potential differences in comfort with remote monitoring between caregivers and care recipients have not been examined in depth. On the dyad and aggregate level, we compare preferences of older adult women and their adult children for three remote monitoring technologies. Their assessments of each technology’s impact on privacy, safety, independence, freedom, relationship with family member, social life, and identity are also compared. Research Design and Methods: This dyadic study used cognitive-based interview probing and value-centered design methods. Twenty-eight individual, in-depth, structured interviews were conducted with 18 women who are Meals on Wheels clients and 10 of their adult children. Results: Meals on Wheels participants reported multiple chronic conditions and an average of 1.7 ADL and 3.3 IADL difficulties; two thirds were enrolled in Medicaid. Adult children preferred each technology more than their mothers did and underestimated both their mothers’ ability to comprehend the functions of the technologies and the importance of engaging them fully in decision making. Most were confident that they could persuade their mothers to adopt. For both groups, privacy was the most-cited concern, and participants perceived significant overlap between values of privacy, independence, identity, and freedom. Discussion and Implications: Studying privacy in isolation overlooks privacy’s instrumental role in enabling other values. Shared decision-making tools are needed to promote remote monitoring use consistent with older adults’ values and to prevent conflict and caregiver overreach.Keywords
Funding Information
- Greenwall Foundation’s bioethics
- Agency for Health Research and Quality, National Research Service Award (T32HS-000011)
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Willingness of older adults to share data and privacy concerns after exposure to unobtrusive in-home monitoringGerontechnology, 2013
- Autonomy in ICT for Older Persons at the Crossroads Between Legal and Care PracticesPublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2012
- Understanding Discrepancy in Perceptions of Values: Individuals With Mild to Moderate Dementia and Their Family CaregiversThe Gerontologist, 2011
- Approaches to and Outcomes of Dyadic Interview AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2010
- ‘But obviously not for me’: robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test usersSociology of Health & Illness, 2010
- How well do family caregivers know their relatives' care values and preferences?Dementia, 2009
- Care recipients’ psychological well-being: The role of sense of control and caregiver typeAging & Mental Health, 2007
- Defining Obtrusiveness in Home Telehealth Technologies: A Conceptual FrameworkJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2006
- Measuring the Values and Preferencesfor Everyday Care of Persons With Cognitive Impairment and Their Family CaregiversThe Gerontologist, 2005
- Cognitive research improves questionnaires.American Journal of Public Health, 1989