A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors
- 1 April 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Hand Therapy
- Vol. 26 (2), 162-171
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2012.07.002
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fade-in – Short stimulation – Fade out approach to sham tDCS – Reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigatorsBrain Stimulation, 2012
- Cortical activation changes underlying stimulation-induced behavioural gains in chronic strokeBrain, 2011
- Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patientsNeurology, 2010
- Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Recovery in Patients with Subacute StrokeAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 2010
- Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: A structured review and meta-analysisHuman Movement Science, 2010
- Lesion Load of the Corticospinal Tract Predicts Motor Impairment in Chronic StrokeStroke, 2010
- Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulationBMC Neuroscience, 2008
- Imaging correlates of motor recovery from cerebral infarction and their physiological significance in well-recovered patientsNeuroImage, 2007
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986