Why are ecological, low-input, multi-resistant wheat cultivars slow to develop commercially? A Belgian agricultural ‘lock-in’ case study
- 15 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Ecological Economics
- Vol. 66 (2-3), 436-446
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Azodyn crop model as a decision support tool for choosing cultivarsAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 2006
- Cultivar Mixtures for the Simultaneous Management of Multiple Diseases: Tan Spot and Leaf Rust of WheatPhytopathology®, 2004
- Influence of cropping system on Fusarium head blight and mycotoxin levels in winter wheatCrop Protection, 2004
- Fusarium head blight: epidemiological origin of the effects of cultural practices on head blight attacks and the production of mycotoxins by Fusarium in wheat grainsPlant Science, 2004
- Managing Pests, Consumers, and Commitments: The Case of Apple Growers and Pear Growers in Belgium's Lower Meuse RegionEnvironment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2003
- Breaking the pesticide chainPesticide Outlook, 2003
- Yield penalties of disease resistance in cropsCurrent Opinion in Plant Biology, 2002
- Breakdown of the Yr17 resistance to yellow rust of wheat in northern EuropeAgronomy for Sustainable Development, 2000
- Sprayed to Death: Path Dependence, Lock-in and Pest Control StrategiesThe Economic Journal, 1996
- Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical EventsThe Economic Journal, 1989