Multiple utilities and weakness of will: A kantian perspective
- 1 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Review of Social Economy
- Vol. 64 (1), 1-20
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760500529914
Abstract
This paper argues that a Kantian model of decision-making, one that incorporates moral duties alongside standard preferences and constraints, can account for the complexities of actual ethical choice within a model with a single (constrained) preference ranking. Multiple utilities are required only to explain the failure to make appropriate decisions. Such occasions, often referred to as cases of weakness of will or akrasia, are easily explained with this approach, which is also consistent with the recent work of philosopher John Searle on action theory and rational choice. More generally, this paper highlights the need for discussion of the will in economics.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Problem with Utility: Toward a Non-Consequentialist/Utility Theory SynthesisReview of Social Economy, 1999
- ECONOMIC MAN AS A MORAL INDIVIDUALEconomic Inquiry, 1998
- The Futility of Multiple UtilityEconomics and Philosophy, 1993
- The Utility of Multiple Utility: A Comment on BrennanEconomics and Philosophy, 1993
- Rationality in ActionMind, 1993
- The Problem of Weakness of WillNoûs, 1989
- Prices and SanctionsColumbia Law Review, 1984
- Kant and Weakness of WillKant Studien, 1982
- Skepticism about Weakness of WillThe Philosophical Review, 1977
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityJournal of Political Economy, 1955