BOUNDED RATIONALITY
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Political Science
- Vol. 2 (1), 297-321
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.297
Abstract
▪ Abstract Findings from behavioral organization theory, behavioral decision theory, survey research, and experimental economics leave no doubt about the failure of rational choice as a descriptive model of human behavior. But this does not mean that people and their politics are irrational. Bounded rationality asserts that decision makers are intendedly rational; that is, they are goal-oriented and adaptive, but because of human cognitive and emotional architecture, they sometimes fail, occasionally in important decisions. Limits on rational adaptation are of two types: procedural limits, which limit how we go about making decisions, and substantive limits, which affect particular choices directly. Rational analysis in institutional contexts can serve as a standard for adaptive, goal-oriented human behavior. In relatively fixed task environments, such as asset markets or elections, we should be able to divide behavior into adaptive, goal-oriented behavior (that is, rational action) and behavior that is a consequence of processing limits, and we should then be able to measure the deviation. The extent of deviation is an empirical issue. These classes are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, and they may be examined empirically in situations in which actors make repeated similar choices.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Herd Behaviour, Bubbles and CrashesThe Economic Journal, 1995
- Rationality in Political BehaviorPolitical Psychology, 1995
- Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political ChoiceAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- “Stability” and “Competition” in Budgetary TheoryAmerican Political Science Review, 1982
- Hierarchy and Ecological Control in Federal Budgetary Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1981
- Bounded Rationality, Ambiguity, and the Engineering of ChoiceThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1978
- Bases of Budgetary IncrementalismAmerican Political Science Review, 1974
- Towards A Predictive Theory of Government Expenditure: Us Domestic AppropriationsBritish Journal of Political Science, 1974
- A Theory of the Budgetary ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1966
- The Science of "Muddling Through"Public Administration Review, 1959