Improving Mammographic Interpretation: Double Reading and Computer-Aided Diagnosis
- 30 September 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Radiologic Clinics of North America
- Vol. 45 (5), 801-811
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2007.06.004
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Recall Rate on Earlier Screen Detection of Breast Cancers Based on the Dutch Performance IndicatorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Is Maximum Positive Predictive Value a Good Indicator of an Optimal Screening Mammography Practice?American Journal of Roentgenology, 2005
- Recall and detection rates in screening mammographyCancer, 2004
- Evaluation of Proscriptive Health Care Policy Implementation in Screening MammographyRadiology, 2003
- Association of Volume and Volume-Independent Factors With Accuracy in Screening Mammogram InterpretationJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003
- Performance Parameters for Screening and Diagnostic Mammography: Specialist and General RadiologistsRadiology, 2002
- Improving the Accuracy of Mammography: Volume and Outcome RelationshipsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Association of Recall Rates with Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Values of Screening MammographyAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Radiology's Achilles' heel: error and variation in the interpretation of the Röntgen image.The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
- Variability in Radiologists' Interpretations of MammogramsThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1994