Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence
Open Access
- 6 May 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 138 (9), 751-760
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-138-9-200305060-00013
Abstract
There have been many proposals for objective standards designed to optimize training, testing, and maintaining competency in interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs). However, most of these recommendations are consensus based and are not derived from clinical trials that include patient outcomes. To critically review the available data on training, accuracy, and outcomes of computer and physician interpretation of 12-lead resting ECGs. English-language articles were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1974 to 2002), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (19752002). The references in articles selected for analysis were also reviewed for relevance. All articles on training, accuracy, and outcomes of ECG interpretations were analyzed. Study design and results were summarized in evidence tables. Information on physician interpretation compared to a gold standard, typically a consensus panel of expert electrocardiographers, was extracted. The clinical context of and outcomes related to the ECG interpretation were obtained whenever possible. Physicians of all specialties and levels of training, as well as computer software for interpreting ECGs, frequently made errors in interpreting ECGs when compared to expert electrocardiographers. There was also substantial disagreement on interpretations among cardiologists. Adverse patient outcomes occurred infrequently when ECGs were incorrectly interpreted. There is no evidence-based minimum number of ECG interpretations that is ideal for attaining or maintaining competency in ECG interpretation skills. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal way to build and maintain ECG interpretation skills based on patient outcomes. Deceased.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do computer generated ECG reports improve interpretation by accident and emergency senior house officers?Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,2001
- Errors in Emergency Physician Interpretation of ST‐segment Elevation in Emergency Department Chest Pain PatientsAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Use of fax facility improves decision making regarding thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.Heart, 1997
- Effect of Cardiologist ECG Review on Emergency Department PracticeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Improving the interpretation of electrocardiographs in an accident and emergency departmentPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1995
- Analysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1994
- Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiogramsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Quality assurance in the emergency department: Evaluation of the ECG review processAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- Electrocardiograph interpretation by junior doctors.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1990
- Clinical characteristics and natural history of patients with acute myocardial infarction sent home from the emergency roomThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987