The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States
- 1 November 2003
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Global Environmental Politics
- Vol. 3 (4), 1-23
- https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757907
Abstract
The United States, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, is not going to ratify the Kyoto Protocol in the foreseeable future. Yet, a number of countries have decided to stay on the Kyoto track. Four main explanations for this apparent puzzle are considered. The first is that remaining Annex I countries still expect the Kyoto Protocol to reduce global warming sufficiently to outweigh the economic costs of implementation. The second is that the parties, by implementing the treaty, hope to induce non-parties to follow suit at some later stage. A third hypothesis is that EU climate institutions have generated a momentum that has made a change of course difficult. Finally, Kyoto's persistence may be linked to the European Union's desire to stand forth as an international leader in the field of climate politics. We conclude that the first two explanations have little explanatory power, but find the latter two more promising.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Leaders, pushers and laggards in the making of the climate regimeGlobal Environmental Change, 2002
- A Theory of Full International CooperationJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1999
- The climate change negotiations: Buenos Aires and beyondGlobal Environmental Change, 1999
- EU Environmental Policy at 25: The Politics of Multinational GovernanceEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 1998
- `Leader' and `Entrepreneur' in International Negotiations:European Journal of International Relations, 1995
- Business and the genesis of the European Community carbon tax proposalBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 1994
- Global environmental problems: The effects of unilateral actions taken by one countryJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1991
- Strategies for Eliciting Cooperation from an AdversaryJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1987
- Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical DynamicsComparative Politics, 1984
- Causes of Negotiation ‘Failure’*European Journal of Political Research, 1983