The continued search for nonarbitrary metrics in psychology.
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in American Psychologist
- Vol. 61 (1), 50-55
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.61.1.50
Abstract
H. Blanton and J. Jaccard examined the arbitrariness of metrics in the context of 2 current issues: (a) the measurement of racial prejudice and (b) the establishment of clinically significant change. According to Blanton and Jaccard, although research findings are not undermined by arbitrary metrics, individual scores and score changes may not be meaningfully interpreted. The author believes that their points are mostly valid and that their examples were appropriate. However, Blanton and Jaccard's article does not lead directly to solutions, nor did it adequately describe the scope of the metric problem. This article has 2 major goals. First, some prerequisites for nonarbitrary metrics are presented and related to Blanton and Jaccard's issues. Second, the impact of arbitrary metrics on psychological research findings are described. In contrast to Blanton and Jaccard (2006), research findings suggest that metrics have direct impact on statistics for group comparisons and trend analysis.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item Response Theory Models and Spurious Interaction Effects in Factorial ANOVA DesignsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1996
- A Generalized Partial Credit Model: Application of an EM AlgorithmApplied Psychological Measurement, 1992
- Parametric statistics and levels of measurement: Factorial designs and multiple regression.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- Measurement and statistics: An examination of construct validity.Psychological Bulletin, 1985
- Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived.Psychological Bulletin, 1984
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955
- On the Statistical Treatment of Football Numbers.American Psychologist, 1953
- The absolute zero in intelligence measurement.Psychological Review, 1928
- A method of scaling psychological and educational tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1925
- A criticism of the Yerkes-Bridges Point Scale, with alternative suggestions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1917