Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts?
- 18 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Animal Ecology
- Vol. 80 (3), 508-518
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01798.x
Abstract
1. Why are some common and apparently suitable resources avoided by potential users? This interesting ecological and evolutionary conundrum is vividly illustrated by obligate brood parasites. Parasitic birds lay their eggs into nests of a wide range of host species, including many rare ones, but do not parasitize some commonly co-occurring potential hosts. 2. Attempts to explain the absence of parasitism in common potential hosts are limited and typically focused on single-factor explanations while ignoring other potential factors. We tested why thrushes Turdus spp. are extremely rarely parasitized by common cuckoos Cuculus canorus despite breeding commonly in sympatry and building the most conspicuous nests among forest-breeding passerines. 3. No single examined factor explained cuckoo avoidance of thrushes. Life-history traits of all six European thrush species and the 10 most frequently used cuckoo hosts in Europe were similar except body/egg size, nest design and nestling diet. 4. Experiments (n = 1211) in several populations across Europe showed that host defences at egg-laying and incubation stages did not account for the lack of cuckoo parasitism in thrushes. However, cross-fostering experiments disclosed that various factors during the nestling period prevent cuckoos from successfully parasitizing thrushes. Specifically, in some thrush species, the nest cup design forced cuckoo chicks to compete with host chicks with fatal consequences for the parasite. Other species were reluctant to care even for lone cuckoo chicks. 5. Importantly, in an apparently phylogenetically homogenous group of hosts, there were interspecific differences in factors responsible for the absence of cuckoo parasitism. 6. This study highlights the importance of considering multiple potential factors and their interactions for understanding absence of parasitism in potential hosts of parasitic birds. In the present study, comparative and experimental procedures are integrated, which represent a novel approach that should prove useful for the understanding of interspecific ecological relationships in general.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolutionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2009
- Differential reproductive success favours strong host preference in a highly specialized brood parasiteProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2008
- Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size mattersBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2006
- HOST RECOGNITION OF BROOD PARASITES: IMPLICATIONS FOR METHODOLOGY IN STUDIES OF ENEMY RECOGNITIONOrnithology, 2005
- CONFRONTING MULTICOLLINEARITY IN ECOLOGICAL MULTIPLE REGRESSIONEcology, 2003
- Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo's host?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2001
- Behavioral Defenses against Avian Brood Parasitism in Sympatric and Allopatric Host PopulationsEvolution, 1992
- Differential parasitism of least flycatchers and yellow warblers by the brown-headed cowbirdBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1990
- An Experimental Study of Co-Evolution Between the Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its Hosts. I. Host Egg DiscriminationJournal of Animal Ecology, 1989
- Cuckoo Hosts in British HabitatsBird Study, 1972