Gender disparities in the assessment and management of cardiovascular risk in primary care: the AusHEART study
- 11 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
- Vol. 18 (3), 498-503
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1741826710389369
Abstract
Aims: Studies indicate ongoing gender-based differences in the prevention, detection and management of cardiovascular disease. The aims of this study were to determine whether there are differences in general practitioners’ (GPs’) perceptions of a patient’s cardiovascular risk compared with the patient’s estimated risk and in the patient’s subsequent medical management according to patient sex. Methods: The Australian Hypertension and Absolute Risk Study (AusHEART) was a nationally representative, cluster-stratified, cross-sectional survey among 322 GPs. Each GP was asked to collect data on cardiovascular disease risk factors and their management in 15–20 consecutive patients (age ≥55 years) who presented between April and June, 2008. They were also asked to estimate each patient’s absolute risk of a cardiovascular event in the next five years. The main outcomes were the Adjusted Framingham risk, GP estimated risk and proportion of patients receiving blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet therapy. Results: A total of 5293 patients were recruited to the study, of whom 2968 (56%) were women. Among patients without established cardiovascular disease, the level of agreement between the GP estimated risk and the Adjusted Framingham risk was poor (P homogeneity = 0.57). For patients with established cardiovascular disease, however, women were more likely to be assigned by the GP to a lower risk category (66% vs. 54%, P < 0.001) and less likely to be prescribed combination (blood pressure-lowering, statin and antiplatelet) (44% vs. 56%, P < 0.001) therapy compared with men, even after adjusting for patient age. Conclusions: Cardiovascular risk is underrecognized and undertreated in Australian primary care patients, with women apparently disproportionately affected. These findings underscore the importance of initiatives to raise awareness of cardiovascular disease in women.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Womenʼs Perceptions of Coronary Heart DiseaseJournal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 2005
- Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: Large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement InitiativeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Inequity in Recording of Risk in a Local Population-Based Screening Programme for Cardiovascular DiseaseEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2005
- Opportunity for Intervention to Achieve American Heart Association Guidelines for Optimal Lipid Levels in High-Risk Women in a Managed Care SettingCirculation, 2005
- National Study of Physician Awareness and Adherence to Cardiovascular Disease Prevention GuidelinesCirculation, 2005
- Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratioBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2003
- Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries. Principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey ProgrammeEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- Causal attributions for angina: results of an interview studyCoronary Health Care, 2000
- Sex Bias and Underutilization of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease at Academic Medical Centers in the United States and CanadaArchives of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Cardiovascular disease risk profilesAmerican Heart Journal, 1991