A Commentary on “What Grounded Theory Is…”
- 9 March 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Organizational Research Methods
- Vol. 18 (4), 600-605
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115574747
Abstract
In my editorial and authorial experiences, Grounded Theory approaches to organizational research have proven to be some of the most powerful forms of inquiry we have into modern organizing and organizations. And part of that power comes from its ability to utilize both qualitative and quantitative data. But unlike Walsh et al., I do not believe Grounded Theory is capable of being an all-encompassing research paradigm, nor should it be. The heart and soul of GT methodologies lies in engaging a phenomenon from the perspective of those living it, which means it is most suited toward inductive examinations seeking deep insight into a phenomenon and its connections with the context. Likewise, I also disagree that a GT approach is best used as a sequential, lockstep set of techniques that should be followed precisely; the power of GT approaches is partly derived from the potential to let those closest to the phenomenon influence how it is studied. Yes, I agree that there are key components to the methodology that must be used in combination, but each study is unique (because each phenomenon is unique) and thus there must be room for adaptation and creativity in the implementation of the approach. Ultimately, then, we agree that GT approaches are a powerful way to examine the world around us, but I see much more promise in letting GT bloom and adapt to the phenomena and contexts under study, as opposed to strictly adhering to the original ideas extended by Glaser & Strauss (1967).Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Support to Mutiny: Shifting Legitimacy Judgments and Emotional Reactions Impacting the Implementation of Radical ChangeThe Academy of Management Journal, 2014
- Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 2012
- Publishing inAMJ—Part 7: What's Different about Qualitative Research?The Academy of Management Journal, 2012
- Clean Climbing, Carabiners, and Cultural Cultivation: Developing an Open-Systems Perspective of CultureOrganization Science, 2011
- The Coming of Age for Qualitative Research: Embracing the Diversity of Qualitative MethodsThe Academy of Management Journal, 2011
- Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-offAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2004
- Rewriting the Discovery of Grounded Theory after 25 Years?Journal of Management Inquiry, 1996
- Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts ConvinceOrganization Science, 1993
- ProspectingPublished by Project MUSE ,1989
- The Act of ReadingPublished by Project MUSE ,1978