Evolution of Stress Response in the Face of Unreliable Environmental Signals
Open Access
- 16 August 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Computational Biology
- Vol. 8 (8), e1002627
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002627
Abstract
Most organisms live in ever-changing environments, and have to cope with a range of different conditions. Often, the set of biological traits that are needed to grow, reproduce, and survive varies between conditions. As a consequence, organisms have evolved sensory systems to detect environmental signals, and to modify the expression of biological traits in response. However, there are limits to the ability of such plastic responses to cope with changing environments. Sometimes, environmental shifts might occur suddenly, and without preceding signals, so that organisms might not have time to react. Other times, signals might be unreliable, causing organisms to prepare themselves for changes that then do not occur. Here, we focus on such unreliable signals that indicate the onset of adverse conditions. We use analytical and individual-based models to investigate the evolution of simple rules that organisms use to decide whether or not to switch to a protective state. We find evolutionary transitions towards organisms that use a combination of random switching and switching in response to the signal. We also observe that, in spatially heterogeneous environments, selection on the switching strategy depends on the composition of the population, and on population size. These results are in line with recent experiments that showed that many unicellular organisms can attain different phenotypic states in a probabilistic manner, and lead to testable predictions about how this could help organisms cope with unreliable signals. Most organisms are occasionally exposed to adverse environmental conditions, and can express protective features that help them mitigate the harmful effects of environmental stresses, such as infections, exposure to UV light or chemicals, or sudden habitat changes. Interestingly, a number of recent experiments with unicellular microbes revealed marked variability in the responses to such stress between genetically identical individuals. Some individuals express protective features even in the absence of stress; others do not express these features even if stress reaches substantial levels. Why is stress response, which seems so important for organisms, not more tightly controlled? One possibility is that this variation can help organisms mediate between costs and benefits of protection. These protective features are usually expressed in response to environmental signals that indicate stress. However, most signals are not absolutely reliable. Sometimes stressful conditions will not be preceded by a signal; other times, a signal might not be followed by stress. We used analytical and individual-based models to investigate how a probabilistic expression of stress response can evolve in response to unreliable signals, and in how the ecological setting influences the evolutionary dynamics.This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exclusion rules, bottlenecks and the evolution of stochastic phenotype switchingProceedings. Biological sciences, 2011
- A Simple Screen to Identify Promoters Conferring High Levels of Phenotypic NoisePLoS Genetics, 2008
- Bet-hedging and epigenetic inheritance in bacterial cell developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2008
- Diversity in times of adversity: probabilistic strategies in microbial survival gamesJournal of Theoretical Biology, 2005
- Noise in eukaryotic gene expressionNature, 2003
- Formal Darwinism, the individual–as–maximizing–agent analogy and bet–hedgingProceedings. Biological sciences, 1999
- The Inheritance of Phenotypes: an Adaptation to Fluctuating EnvironmentsJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1996
- Adaptive “coin-flipping”: a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variationJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1982
- Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcomeJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1967
- Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environmentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1966