Classifications for Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 January 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (1), e14566
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014566
Abstract
Rising cesarean section (CS) rates are a major public health concern and cause worldwide debates. To propose and implement effective measures to reduce or increase CS rates where necessary requires an appropriate classification. Despite several existing CS classifications, there has not yet been a systematic review of these. This study aimed to 1) identify the main CS classifications used worldwide, 2) analyze advantages and deficiencies of each system. Three electronic databases were searched for classifications published 1968–2008. Two reviewers independently assessed classifications using a form created based on items rated as important by international experts. Seven domains (ease, clarity, mutually exclusive categories, totally inclusive classification, prospective identification of categories, reproducibility, implementability) were assessed and graded. Classifications were tested in 12 hypothetical clinical case-scenarios. From a total of 2948 citations, 60 were selected for full-text evaluation and 27 classifications identified. Indications classifications present important limitations and their overall score ranged from 2–9 (maximum grade = 14). Degree of urgency classifications also had several drawbacks (overall scores 6–9). Woman-based classifications performed best (scores 5–14). Other types of classifications require data not routinely collected and may not be relevant in all settings (scores 3–8). This review and critical appraisal of CS classifications is a methodologically sound contribution to establish the basis for the appropriate monitoring and rational use of CS. Results suggest that women-based classifications in general, and Robson's classification, in particular, would be in the best position to fulfill current international and local needs and that efforts to develop an internationally applicable CS classification would be most appropriately placed in building upon this classification. The use of a single CS classification will facilitate auditing, analyzing and comparing CS rates across different settings and help to create and implement effective strategies specifically targeted to optimize CS rates where necessary.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recommendations for Routine Reporting on Indications for Cesarean Delivery in Developing CountriesBirth, 2008
- The unmet need for Emergency Obstetric Care in Tanga Region, TanzaniaBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2007
- Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health:Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 2004
- Mandatory second opinion to reduce rates of unnecessary caesarean sections in Latin America: a cluster randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2004
- Classification of caesarean sectionsFetal and Maternal Medicine Review, 2001
- Assessing the Role of Case Mix in Cesarean Delivery RatesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- The standard primipara as a basis for inter‐unit comparisons of maternity careBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section ratesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Determinants of the Increasing Cesarean Birth Rate Ontario Data 1979 to 1982Obstetric Anesthesia Digest, 1985
- Determinants of the Increasing Cesarean Birth RateThe New England Journal of Medicine, 1984