Sample Size Calculations for Cluster Randomised Trials
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
- Vol. 5 (1), 12-16
- https://doi.org/10.1177/135581960000500105
Abstract
Objectives: Cluster randomised trials, in which groups of individuals are randomised, are increasingly being used in the health field. Adopting a clustered approach has implications for the design of such trials, and sample size calculations need to be inflated to accommodate for the clustering effect. Reliable estimates of intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) are required for robust sample size calculations to be made; however, little empirical evidence is available on their likely size, and on factors which influence their magnitude. The aim of this study was to generate empirical estimates of ICCs and to explore factors which may affect their magnitude. Methods: Empirical estimates of ICCs were calculated for both process variables and patient outcomes from a number of datasets of primary and secondary care implementation studies. Results: Estimates of ICCs varied according to setting and type of outcome. Estimates of ICCs for process variables were higher than those for patient outcomes, and estimates derived from secondary care were higher than those from primary care. ICCs for process variables in primary care were of the order of 0.05–0.15, whilst those in secondary care were of the order of 0.3. Estimates for patient outcomes in primary care were generally lower than 0.05. Conclusions: Adopting cluster randomisation has implications for the design, size and analysis of clinical trials. This study gives an insight into the potential size of ICCs in primary and secondary care, and provides a practical guide to researchers to aid the planning of future studies in this area.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cluster randomised trials: time for improvementBMJ, 1998
- Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric unitsBMJ, 1998
- Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important?BMJ, 1998
- The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians’ patient care behaviorJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1992
- Medical audit in general practice. I: Effects on doctors' clinical behaviour for common childhood conditions. North of England Study of Standards and Performance in General Practice.BMJ, 1992
- Randomization by Group in Studying the Effect of Drug Information in Primary CareInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1992
- Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designsStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Sample size formulae for intervention studies with the cluster as unit of randomizationStatistics in Medicine, 1988
- An Empirical Study of Cluster RandomizationInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1982
- RANDOMIZATION BY CLUSTERAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1981