Invasiveness as a Barrier to Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Diabetes
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 7 (4), 612-619
- https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2005.7.612
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the degree to which the invasive characteristic of glucose monitoring is a barrier to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Methods: A paper-and-pencil Measure of Invasiveness as a reason for Skipping SMBG (MISS) was created and administered to 339 people with diabetes. The correlations between MISS scores and actual SMBG frequency, percent adherence to SMBG recommendations, SMBG anxiety, SMBG burden, and knowledge of the importance of glycemic control for avoiding diabetes complications were each explored. Results: On a scale of 0–28, the average MISS score was M = 4.3 (SD = 5.4, range 0–28). Fully 63% (nearly two-thirds) of respondents reported skipping SMBG because of the invasiveness of the procedure. MISS scores were negatively related to percent adherence to healthcare provider SMBG recommendations as measured by memory function of automated meters (Spearman's r= –0.47, P < 0.01). MISS scores were also negatively related to absolute SMBG frequency regardless of SMBG recommendations (Spearman's r= –0.11, P < 0.05). Correlation between the MISS and SMBG anxiety was significant (Spearman's r = 0.50, P < 0.01). With highly anxious participants deleted, the magnitude of the correlation was attenuated, but persisted (Spearman's r = 0.28, P < 0.01), suggesting that invasiveness is associated with SMBG anxiety even among patients without a blood or injection phobia. MISS scores were also correlated with the degree to which patients find routine and non-routine SMBG checks a burden (routine r = 0.38, P < 0.01; non-routine r = 0.45, P < 0.01). Results of Mann–Whitney U tests indicated higher MISS scores among participants with less knowledge about the importance of glycemic control in the development of diabetes vascular complications. Conclusions: Invasiveness is a common and serious barrier to SMBG. These findings suggest that people with diabetes would perform SMBG more frequently and have improved quality of life with non-invasive SMBG.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Health Maintenance Organization Coverage of Self-monitoring Devices on Diabetes Self-care and Glycemic ControlArchives of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Overcoming Obstacles to Behavior Change in Diabetes Self-ManagementThe Diabetes Educator, 2003
- Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management.Current Diabetes Reports, 2002
- The Impact of Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring on Metabolic Control and Quality of Life in Type 2 Diabetic PatientsDiabetes Care, 2001
- Phobia of self‐injecting and self‐testing in insulin‐treated diabetes patients: opportunities for screeningDiabetic Medicine, 2001
- Self-monitoring of blood glucose: language and financial barriers in a managed care population with diabetes.Diabetes Care, 2000
- Current status and future prospects of parenteral insulin regimens, strategies and delivery systems for diabetes treatmentAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999
- Diabetes Self-Management: Self-reported recommendations and patterns in a large populationDiabetes Care, 1997
- Phobic Symptoms, Particularly the Fear of Blood and Injury, Are Associated With Poor Glycemic Control in Type I Diabetic AdultsDiabetes Care, 1997
- On the relation among psychological distress, diabetes-related health behavior, and level of glycosylated hemoglobin in type I diabetesInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 1995