“Deviants” and Democracy
- 4 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in American Politics Research
- Vol. 40 (3), 531-567
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x11432880
Abstract
Punitive policy designs diminish felons as citizens. Scholars know much about the designs’ influence on felons’ political and civil rights. They know little of how policy influences felons’ social rights. Examining the discretion of states to retain or reform federal bans on drug felons receiving cash and food assistance between 1997 and 2004, we explain the choices states make about extending social rights to “deviants.” We draw from theories of neoinstitutional organization, group threat, and political incorporation. Multivariate analysis suggest that the severity of states’ penal regimes and the degree to which felons and poor people threaten social order have the greatest influence on states’ responses to the federal sanctions on drug felons. Our study informs understandings of why some states take a “punitive turn” while other states may counter convention, exercising discretion to reduce rather than increase their punitiveness toward felons specifically and lawbreaking generally.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Consequences of the Carceral StateAmerican Political Science Review, 2010
- Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place and the punitive turn in US welfare policyCambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 2008
- The Racial Divide in Support for the Death Penalty: Does White Racism Matter?Social Forces, 2007
- Group Threat and Social Control: Race, Perceptions of Minorities and the Desire to PunishSocial Forces, 2007
- The myth of punitivenessTheoretical Criminology, 2005
- Beyond Logit and Probit: Cox Duration Models of Single, Repeating, and Competing Events for State Policy AdoptionState Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2005
- A TASTE FOR PUNISHMENT: Black and White Americans' Views on the Death Penalty and the War on DrugsDu Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 2004
- Electoral Competition, Legislative Balance, and American State Welfare PolicyAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2002
- The Power Approach to Intergroup HostilityJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1986
- Interest groups in the criminal justice processJournal of Criminal Justice, 1981