Chilean Blue Whales as a Case Study to Illustrate Methods to Estimate Abundance and Evaluate Conservation Status of Rare Species
- 8 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Conservation Biology
- Vol. 25 (3), 526-535
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01656.x
Abstract
Often abundance of rare species cannot be estimated with conventional design-based methods, so we illustrate with a population of blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) a spatial model-based method to estimate abundance. We analyzed data from line-transect surveys of blue whales off the coast of Chile, where the population was hunted to low levels. Field protocols allowed deviation from planned track lines to collect identification photographs and tissue samples for genetic analyses, which resulted in an ad hoc sampling design with increased effort in areas of higher densities. Thus, we used spatial modeling methods to estimate abundance. Spatial models are increasingly being used to analyze data from surveys of marine, aquatic, and terrestrial species, but estimation of uncertainty from such models is often problematic. We developed a new, broadly applicable variance estimator that showed there were likely 303 whales (95% CI 176–625) in the study area. The survey did not span the whales' entire range, so this is a minimum estimate. We estimated current minimum abundance relative to pre-exploitation abundance (i.e., status) with a population dynamics model that incorporated our minimum abundance estimate, likely population growth rates from a meta-analysis of rates of increase in large baleen whales, and two alternative assumptions about historic catches. From this model, we estimated that the population was at a minimum of 9.5% (95% CI 4.9–18.0%) of pre-exploitation levels in 1998 under one catch assumption and 7.2% (CI 3.7–13.7%) of pre-exploitation levels under the other. Thus, although Chilean blue whales are probably still at a small fraction of pre-exploitation abundance, even these minimum abundance estimates demonstrate that their status is better than that of Antarctic blue whales, which are stillKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Preliminary recordings of blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) vocalizations in the Gulf of Corcovado, northern Patagonia, ChileMarine Mammal Science, 2010
- Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population sizeJournal of Applied Ecology, 2010
- Separating pygmy and Antarctic blue whales using long-forgotten ovarian dataMarine Mammal Science, 2009
- Cost-effective abundance estimation of rare animals: Testing performance of small-boat surveys for killer whales in British ColumbiaBiological Conservation, 2009
- Regional differences in length at sexual maturity for female blue whales based on recovered Soviet whaling dataMarine Mammal Science, 2008
- SEPARATING SOUTHERN BLUE WHALE SUBSPECIES BASED ON LENGTH FREQUENCIES OF SEXUALLY MATURE FEMALESMarine Mammal Science, 2007
- Past and present distribution, densities and movements of blue whales Balaenoptera musculus in the Southern Hemisphere and northern Indian OceanMammal Review, 2007
- The Statistics of Rarity1Ecology, 2005
- Monitoring cetaceans in European watersMammal Review, 2003
- When Are Rare Species Not There?Oikos, 1990