PSG with simultaneous pharyngeal and esophageal pressure measurements of the upper airway may interfere with sleep architecture and cause a bias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the degree of disturbance to sleep caused by inclusion of pressure measurements of the airway, and whether this would reduce the validity of the PSG. Thirty-two consecutive patients referred for PSG for possible obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) were included. For pressure recordings, a 6-F silicone tube, 1.9 mm in diameter, containing six pressure transducers, was introduced through one nostril into the pharynx and esophagus. Each patient had two nocturnal PSGs, one of which included airway pressure measurements. There were no statistically significant differences between PSGs performed with and without simultaneous pressure recordings for the following sleep quality parameters: total sleep time, number of sleep-stage shifts, sleep efficiency, arousal during sleep (= intrasleep wakefulness), percent REM sleep, and number of microarousals. We did not find any statistically significant differences for respiratory parameters such as type, duration, and index of different respiratory events and snoring. However, there was a slight tendency for reduced sleep quality and oxygen saturation when pressure measurements were included. The only significant change seen was in the duration of non-REM sleep with oxygen saturation below 90%. The multisensor airway pressure probe demonstrated that proximal obstructions were more common than distal obstructions, and obstruction in one or two segments was far more frequent than obstruction in more than two.