Unrecognized Misplacement of Endotracheal Tubes by Ground Prehospital Providers
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- focus on-endotracheal-intubation
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Prehospital Emergency Care
- Vol. 11 (2), 213-218
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120701205935
Abstract
Objective. Endotracheal intubation by emergency medical services (EMS) is well established. Esophageal misplacement is a catastrophic complication that has until recently been studied by using methods that have called into question the accuracy of the reported data. The purpose of our study was to determine the incidence of unrecognized endotracheal tube misplacement, reasons for deferred intubations in the field, andto report outcomes in those patients with unrecognized misplacement. Methods. This was a prospective observational study with a consecutive sample. All arriving with an endotracheal tube or in whom endotracheal intubation was performed within 10 minutes of arrival were included, anda physician immediately determined placement. Hospital records were reviewed to determine outcome of those patients in whom the tube was misplaced. Unrecognized esophageal misplacement triggered communication to the medical director of the transporting agency. Results. During the enrollment period, 192 patients were evaluated. Overall, 132 of 192 (69%) were intubated in the prehospital environment, and60 were intubated within 10 minutes of arrival in the emergency department. Among prehospital intubation attempts, 12 of 132 (9%; 95 CI 5.3–15.2), 11 esophageal, and1 hypopharyngeal were misplaced. Right mainstem intubation occurred in an additional 20 of 132 (15%; 95 CI 10.0–22.3). Among patients arriving with unrecognized esophageal misplacement of the endotracheal tube, one patient survived to hospital discharge. Conclusion. The rate of esophageal misplacement of endotracheal tubes in the prehospital environment in our urban setting andthe poor clinical course of patients with unrecognized misplacement is consistent with previous reports, suggesting that the benefit of prehospital airway management does not clearly supercede the potential risks.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Evaluation of Out-of-hospital Advanced Airway Management in an Urban SettingAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2005
- The Effectiveness of Out-of-Hospital Use of Continuous End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Monitoring on the Rate of Unrecognized Misplaced Intubation Within a Regional Emergency Medical Services SystemAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation in traumatic brain injury: Outcomes research provides us with an unexpected outcomeAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation and outcome after traumatic brain injuryAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2004
- Incidence of transient hypoxia and pulse rate reactivity during paramedic rapid sequence intubationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2003
- Unrecognized Misplacement of Endotracheal Tubes in a Mixed Urban to Rural Emergency Medical Services SettingAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2003
- The Effect of Paramedic Rapid Sequence Intubation on Outcome in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2003
- Endotracheal Intubation in the Field Does Not Improve Outcome in Trauma Patients Who Present without an Acutely Lethal Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal Of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care, 2003
- Esophageal Detector Device Versus Detection of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Level in Emergency IntubationAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Prehospital endotracheal tube airway or esophageal gastric tube airway: A critical comparisonAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1985